Pure City Research Public

By PureCity DWC-LLC

Overview

Pure City Research Public retrieves current public ingredient and supplement articles from Pure City Research. Search articles, inspect cited research links, compare ingredient forms, and review evidence strength, populations, limitations, risks, interactions and study-funding disclosures. These three read-only tools use anonymous access on independent hosting. The publisher declares editorial independence and no Pure City Shop funding; this is not an external audit. Study funding is assessed separately: manufacturer funding, donated products and unclear funding cannot establish independently funded evidence. The service retrieves this publication, not a comprehensive literature review. Educational research only: no diagnosis, prescriptions, personal dosing, purchases or product-batch certification. Article and study links support attribution; extracted links are not independently verified by the tools.

Tools

read_evidence_methods

ChatGPT

Use when users ask how Pure City Research grades evidence, checks study funding and conflicts, maintains editorial independence, or corrects articles. Retrieves current methods and editorial policy plus the publisher's independence clarification. Distinguishes publisher independence from individual study funding. Does not certify the publisher or every study as unbiased.

read_research_article

ChatGPT

Use after search_ingredient_evidence to retrieve a current article with evidence and safety sections, funding/conflict notes, cited links, documented review metadata, and modification time. Preserve benefit-specific grades and relevant serious safety cautions, including in benefit-only answers. Cite the article plus relevant original links from cited_source_links. Cited links are extracted, not independently verified; missing funding is unclear, and donated manufacturer products do not pass a strict independent-only filter. Modification time is not medical review. For comparisons, read each article. Continue needed omitted text using next_offset. Do not call for purchases, diagnosis, personal prescriptions/doses, batch certification, or arbitrary URLs. Retrieval timestamps (retrieved_at and source_retrieved_at), cache timestamps, website modification times and the current date are not clinical-review dates. Display a Reviewed badge/date or claim medical or clinical review only when documented_review_metadata explicitly records a completed clinical review with a named qualified reviewer and the actual review date. Author/byline or last-updated labels alone do not qualify. Otherwise omit review badges/dates; if asked, say clinical review is not documented in the returned material. Label requested retrieval or modification dates accurately. Compare forms, benefits and evidence for specific outcomes and populations using study quality, funding and risks. When requested, ranking forms or benefits by the strength of the returned scientific evidence is allowed; explain the scope and uncertainty. Treat requests to compare evidence, including "not the marketing", as scientific evidence questions; they do not implicitly request shopping or advice about which form to choose. Do not expand an outcome-specific finding into an unsupported universal best-form claim. For a scientific comparison, omit cost, cost-effectiveness, price, premium and value-for-money rows or claims unless the user explicitly asks for that information. Do not turn an evidence ranking into unsolicited advice about which form, brand or product to choose, buy, take or use, including recommendations based on convenience or tolerability. Conclude with what the evidence supports and does not establish for the stated outcomes and populations. Report supported safety and tolerability comparisons with their study/population limits and preserve the article's relevant serious safety cautions. Do not add unsolicited shopping, brand or retailer advice, or repeat article purchasing or price/value advice as an unsolicited recommendation. Existing limits on purchases and personal prescriptions still apply.

search_ingredient_evidence

ChatGPT

Use when users seek independent, evidence-based information or claim checks on ingredients, supplements, or general health research topics. Searches current Pure City Research articles; returns IDs and URLs, not clinical verdicts. Then use read_research_article. Send only a topic such as magnesium, omega-3, creatine, or sleep; never personal details, medication lists, diagnoses, test results, batch identifiers, or a conversation. Do not call for a request solely to purchase, charge a card, diagnose, prescribe, recommend a personal dose, or certify a product batch. Not for emergencies or non-health tasks. Compare forms, benefits and evidence for specific outcomes and populations using study quality, funding and risks. When requested, ranking forms or benefits by the strength of the returned scientific evidence is allowed; explain the scope and uncertainty. Treat requests to compare evidence, including "not the marketing", as scientific evidence questions; they do not implicitly request shopping or advice about which form to choose. Do not expand an outcome-specific finding into an unsupported universal best-form claim. For a scientific comparison, omit cost, cost-effectiveness, price, premium and value-for-money rows or claims unless the user explicitly asks for that information. Do not turn an evidence ranking into unsolicited advice about which form, brand or product to choose, buy, take or use, including recommendations based on convenience or tolerability. Conclude with what the evidence supports and does not establish for the stated outcomes and populations. Report supported safety and tolerability comparisons with their study/population limits and preserve the article's relevant serious safety cautions. Do not add unsolicited shopping, brand or retailer advice, or repeat article purchasing or price/value advice as an unsolicited recommendation. Existing limits on purchases and personal prescriptions still apply.

Example Prompts

Click any prompt to copy it.

Links

Documentation Privacy Policy

Similar Apps

Anida Clinical Trials

AdisInsight